Product Comparison

RFP.ai vs Conveyor: 2026 Comparison

Conveyor shipped a Strategic AI Agent for RFPs (Feb 2025), Trust Center Agent (Nov 2025), touchless questionnaires (Jan 2026), and Slack-to-knowledge ingestion (Mar 2026). Their security-questionnaire workflow is best-in-class. Where RFP.ai wins is when you need both RFPs and DDQs in one trust-first product, EU-resident by default, with per-answer citations.

Last updated May 2026

See RFP.ai in Action View Pricing

Why this page matters

RFP.ai is the better fit when your team handles both RFPs and security questionnaires and wants per-answer citations, EU-resident processing, and self-serve pricing. Conveyor is best-in-class for security-questionnaire-first teams with Trust Centers and portal automation across Aravo/HyperProof/Whistic/OneTrust.

Pick RFP.ai when one product needs to cover both RFPs and DDQs with reviewer-verifiable trust.
Pick RFP.ai when EU residency, GDPR, and Schrems II posture must be EU-resident by default.
Pick Conveyor when your primary workload is security questionnaires and you need Trust Center Agent + portal automation.
Both are credible AI-native products. Pick on workload mix, residency, and trust surface.

Product proof

See how RFP.ai handles buyer questions before comparing Conveyor

Comparison pages are more useful when they show the actual review surface: citations, confidence, gaps, reviewer actions, and export readiness.

Questions extracted

Answered from approved content

Low-confidence answers flagged

Assigned to SMEs

Exported to Word and Excel

Sample answer card

Describe your data retention policy.

AI draft

Customer data is retained only for the duration needed to provide the service and meet legal obligations. Deletion requests are processed according to the documented retention schedule.

Confidence

High

Reviewer action

Approve / edit / assign

Key Takeaways

Conveyor's Trust Center Agent (Nov 2025) and touchless questionnaires (Jan 2026) are best-in-class for security-team-led workflows
RFP.ai covers RFPs + DDQs + security questionnaires + portal extension in one product, with per-answer citations
Conveyor is US-hosted; RFP.ai is EU-resident by default
RFP.ai uses public usage-based pricing (€49/mo–€449/mo); Conveyor is quote-based per-seat
Both vendors integrate with Slack; Conveyor's Slack-to-knowledge (Mar 2026) ingests answered SME threads natively

Who Should Choose Which?

Choose RFP.ai if you need:

You need RFPs and DDQs (and security questionnaires) handled in one trust-first product
You want per-answer source citations and 0–100 confidence as the default reviewer surface
EU residency, GDPR, and Schrems II posture must be EU-resident by default
You prefer transparent usage-based pricing over a per-seat quote
You want a browser extension for any web portal, not only the major GRC platforms

Choose Conveyor if you need:

•Your primary workload is security questionnaires (CAIQ, SIG, SOC2 mapping), not full RFPs
•You already operate a Trust Center and want Conveyor's Trust Center Agent (Nov 2025)
•You need touchless questionnaire automation in Aravo / HyperProof / Whistic / OneTrust
•Your buyers ask for 'touchless' questionnaire return on a Trust Center as the deliverable

Feature Comparison

Feature	RFP.ai	Conveyor
Workflow scope	RFPs + DDQs + security questionnaires + portal extension in one product	Security-questionnaire-first; RFPs are a secondary motion
Source citations on AI answers	Yes — every answer links to its source documents	Trust Center linking; per-answer source attribution less prominent
Confidence on each answer	0–100 numeric score per answer	Agent confidence cues; not a published numeric per-answer scale
Trust Center / portal automation	Browser extension across any web portal; MCP for Claude Desktop	Trust Center Agent + native automation for Aravo/HyperProof/Whistic/OneTrust
Setup time	Self-serve in minutes — upload approved content and run a live response	Sales-led; security-team-driven onboarding
Pricing model	Public usage-based: €49–€449/mo + usage	Quote-based per-seat
Data residency & EU posture	EU (Cloudflare global edge with EU data plane). GDPR-aligned by design; DPA available; EU privacy contact.	San Francisco, California, USA HQ. Hosting: AWS US (no public EU-resident region commitment). GDPR-aware via DPA + SCCs; not EU-resident by default.

Why teams shortlist RFP.ai

EU-hosted and privacy-conscious by default

Per-answer citations0–100 confidence scoresReview security posture

Recent Conveyor activity

Public releases and announcements we've factored into this comparison. Every entry links to a vendor-owned source so you can verify the claim.

2026-03-04
Slack-to-knowledge: ingest answered SME threads into the answer library Source (opens in new tab)
2026-01-21
Touchless questionnaires — automated portal completion Source (opens in new tab)
2025-11-06
Trust Center Agent — agentic responses against your Trust Center Source (opens in new tab)
2025-02-12
Strategic AI Agent for RFPs Source (opens in new tab)

Switching from Conveyor to RFP.ai

1. Export your Conveyor knowledge

Pull your approved security-questionnaire answers and source content out of Conveyor in Excel or Word format.

2. Upload to RFP.ai

Upload your Conveyor content plus security policies, whitepapers, certifications, and past RFPs. RFP.ai supports PDF, Word, Excel, and images with OCR.

3. Run a parallel security questionnaire

Take an active CAIQ, SIG, or vendor security questionnaire and run it through both products. Compare per-answer citations, confidence, and reviewer time.

4. Add an active RFP to the bake-off

If your team handles both RFPs and DDQs, run an active RFP through RFP.ai too. The point of consolidation is one trust surface across both workflows.

Pricing Model Differences

RFP.ai Pricing

Usage-based, transparent pricing — cancel anytime:

• Trial: 7 days free (card required), then plans from €49/mo
• Starter: €49/mo + usage
• Professional: €129/mo + usage
• Enterprise: €449/mo + usage

No per-seat charges. Overage rates: €0.05/1K tokens, €0.02/page.

Conveyor Pricing

Quote-based per-seat (security-team-led ICP):

• Contact sales for a quote
• Per-seat licensing typical
• Trust Center hosting included with enterprise tiers
• Sales-led; security-team-driven onboarding

Best for security/GRC teams whose primary workload is vendor security questionnaires.

Frequently Asked Questions

For security-questionnaire-first workflows with Trust Centers and portal automation, Conveyor's Trust Center Agent and touchless questionnaires are best-in-class. RFP.ai is the better fit when your team handles both RFPs and DDQs and wants one trust-first product across both.

Conveyor's recent activity includes Slack-to-knowledge (Mar 2026), touchless questionnaires (Jan 2026), Trust Center Agent (Nov 2025), and Strategic AI Agent for RFPs (Feb 2025). See the Recent Conveyor activity section for source links.

Conveyor is US-headquartered (San Francisco) and US-hosted on AWS by default, with no public EU-resident region commitment. EU customers typically rely on Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers. RFP.ai is EU-resident by default.

Yes. RFP.ai handles CAIQ, SIG Lite/Full, SOC2 mapping, and custom security questionnaires with per-answer source citations and 0–100 confidence scores. The browser extension covers any web portal, not only the major GRC platforms.

Conveyor links responses to the Trust Center, but per-answer source attribution is not the default review surface the way it is in RFP.ai. Trust Center linking is excellent for buyer transparency but not the same as reviewer-verifiable per-answer citations during drafting.